Legal Opinion · Dissent

Buckles v. Lambert

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 30, 1863Published

CASH 33 — PETITION ORDINARY cited 3 ilia?-., 337; 16 B. Mon., 356; 4 J. J. Mar., 269; 4 Litt., 134; 3 Mon., 137; 1 J. J. Mar., 198; Civil Code, sec. 399. cited 3 Mar., 337; 16 B. Mon., 356; 4 J. J. Mar., 269; 4 Litt., 134; 3 Mon., 137; 1 J. J. Mar., 198. C. G. Wintersmith, for appellee, cited Civil Code, secs. 347, 398; 17 B. Mon., 188; Fleety vs. Bell, Mss. Opin., December, 1855.

1Dissent

JUDGE WILLIAMS,

dissenting from the opinion of the majority of the court, delivered the following opinion:

With all due deference to the majority of the court, I must dissent from the opinion in this case.

By the rules of the common law, juries were not authorized to give several damages in a joint action against trespassers, save in a very peculiar class of cases where a joint action against several trespassers could be maintained. (See 3 Mon., 137; 1 J. J. Mar., 361; 4 J. J. Mar., 269.)

If the jury should assess several damages against joint trespassers, the plaintiff might either take a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hedger v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API