Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Artis

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 10, 2012No. AC 32048Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLavine, J.

I agree with the majority that the trial court properly *618denied the motion for a judgment of acquittal, postver-dict, filed by the defendant, Troy Artis, as to the charge of accessory to assault in the first degree by means of a dangerous instrument and, therefore, join in part I of the majority opinion. Because I believe that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim’s identification of the defendant and that, even if it did, such error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, I respectfully dissent from the remainder of the majority opinion.

I

RELIABILITY OF THE…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API