Key Corporate Capital, Inc. v. County of Beaufort
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Dissent
Chief Justice TOAL:
I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the court of appeals’ decision, but remand the case for a determination of the *63appropriate amount Beaufort County, must disgorge as a result of its unjust enrichment.
A court may grant equitable relief where there is no adequate remedy at law. Santee Cooper Resort, Inc. v. South Carolina Pub. Serv. Comm’n, 298 S.C. 179, 185, 379 S.E.2d 119, 123 (1989). An adequate remedy at law is one which provides the plaintiff with “the' full end and justice of the case. It is not enough that there is some remedy at law, but that remedy must be as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- North River Insurance v. GibsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Stanley Smith & Sons v. Limestone CollegeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Abell v. BellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Santee Cooper Resort, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.