Stark v. Wilder
Supreme Court of Vermont
Bill in Chancery.* The substance of the allegations and the proof is sufficiently set forth in the opinion. The bill was dismissed, and the orator appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtPierpoint, J.
This bill is brought principally to compel the defendant to release to the orator all claim and interest, which the defendant has in and to certain described premises, by virtue of a mortgage executed to the defendant by one Lincoln Raymond ; the orator having a subsequent mortgage of the same premises from- said Raymond.
It appears from the admitted allegations and the proof, that *753both the orator and defendant had caused the equity of redemption in Raymond, under each of their respective mortgages, to be foreclosed. The orator not having been made a party to the defendant’s bill against…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Clark v. GliddenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
- Cooley v. HatchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Green v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
- Holmes v. CadenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
- Cooley v. HatchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.