Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. Palo Duro Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 21, 1941No. 5783PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Chief Justice.

At a former day of the present term of this court we sustained appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal in this case, because the judgment entered and appealed from did not appear to be final, in that it did not show disposition of one of the defendants, A. T. Brannon. Subsequently appellants filed their motion to set aside the order of dismissal and to reinstate the cause on the docket of this court, showing by supplemental transcript that said defendant, A. T. Brannon, had in fact been properly dismissed from the cause by order of the court prior to the trial, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Panhandle Const. Co. v. LindseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  2. Panhandle Construction Co. v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Scroggs v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. De La Moriniere v. SamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corporation v. SmitheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Jones v. KuhnTexas Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API