Legal Opinion

People v. McLane

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*701OPINION OF THE COURT

Budd G. Goodman, J.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

When a psychiatrist appointed pursuant to County Law § 722-c realizes that a case involves a defendant who has a history of brain dysfunction resulting from a prior gunshot wound to the head and knows, as he later acknowledges, that he lacks a detailed understanding of the relationship of various brain structures to emotions and behavior, what is the psychiatrist’s professional obligation to defendant and to the court? What is the appropriate judicial response to a breach of such professional obligations?

After a psychiatrist appointed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. People v. EdneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. In re the Director of the Assigned Counsel PlanNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Director of the Assigned Counsel Plan v. TownsendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Gross v. AmbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. GravesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API