Legal Opinion
Jacobs v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 23, 2001No. 4D00-2180PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
AFFIRMED. See Gray v. State, 780 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(rejecting claim that under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), habitual offender sentence is unconstitutional — “Apprendi does not apply to enhanced sentences based on prior conviction.”).
POLEN, TAYLOR, JJ., and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN K., Associate Judge, concur.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- Preston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001