Lavett v. Federal Market Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton Ward, J.
Plaintiff moves for an order “ vacating a notice to take the testimony of the plaintiff * # * on the ground that the service of the said notice was untimely under Eule III of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Brie County ’ ’.
The notice to take testimony is the usual notice to take the testimony of a party pursuant to sections 288, 289 and 290 of the Civil Practice Act and rules 121 and 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice.
Rule III of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Erie County, reads as follows:
“Rule III. Notes of Issue:
“ Notes of issue must be filed as required…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cerrone v. S'DoiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Murray's Trucking Service, Inc. v. Manhattan Lire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Davis v. DavisNew York County Court, Ulster County · 1962
- Maidenbaum v. Incorporated Village of KensingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Staud v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964