Legal Opinion

Lavett v. Federal Market Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton Ward, J.

Plaintiff moves for an order “ vacating a notice to take the testimony of the plaintiff * # * on the ground that the service of the said notice was untimely under Eule III of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Brie County ’ ’.

The notice to take testimony is the usual notice to take the testimony of a party pursuant to sections 288, 289 and 290 of the Civil Practice Act and rules 121 and 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Rule III of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Erie County, reads as follows:

“Rule III. Notes of Issue:
“ Notes of issue must be filed as required…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cerrone v. S'DoiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  2. Murray's Trucking Service, Inc. v. Manhattan Lire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Davis v. DavisNew York County Court, Ulster County · 1962
  4. Maidenbaum v. Incorporated Village of KensingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Staud v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API