Legal Opinion

Wilmot Psychiatric/Medicenter Tucson v. Shalala

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 16, 1993No. 92-55602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

OVERVIEW

This case arises from the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ (“Secretary”) decision not to reimburse Wilmot Psychiatric/Medicenter and several other hospitals (“hospitals”) under Part C of the Medicare program. Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(v)(l)(A), for the cost of complimentary meals provided by the hospitals to attending physicians, who have staff privileges at the hospitals. The hospitals appeal the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Secretary. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Wilmot…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. ST. ELIZABETH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Memorial, Inc. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,075Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Congress of California Seniors v. Catholic Healthcare WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. International Rehabilitative Sciences, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
  4. (DP) Dickey v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. Wilmot Psychiatric Medicenter Tucson v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API