Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Riceland Foods

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 12, 1994No. CA 93-1115Published

1DissentJames R. Cooper, Judge

I dissent because I do not agree that the Commission made any findings justifying denial of benefits. In cases, such as the case at bar, where the Commission has denied a claim because of a failure to show entitlement to benefits by a preponderance of the evidence, we will affirm if the Commission’s opinion displays a substantial basis for the denial of relief. Williams v. Arkansas Oak Flooring, 267 Ark. 810, 590 S.W.2d 328 (Ark. App. 1979).

Here, the Commission denied relief solely on the basis of its finding that the appellant injured his back while attempting to move a freezer at his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Cagle Fabricating & Steel, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Colonial Nursing Home v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API