Legal Opinion

James E. McDaniel Libelant-Appellant v. The M/s Lisholt, Her Engines, Etc., and A/s Lise, Her Owner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 22, 1960No. 26138_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

On the previous appeal of this case this court held that respondent was not under a duty to provide a seaworthy ship to libelant, a shore-based fireman, and that its only duty to libelant, whose status aboard the ship was that of a licensee, was to refrain from willful or wanton negligence. McDaniel v. The M/S Lisholt, 2 Cir., 257 F.2d 538, affirming D.C. S.D.N.Y., 155 F.Supp. 619. The Supreme Court in a Per Curiam opinion, 359 U.S. 26, 79 S.Ct. 602, 3 L.Ed.2d 625, remanded the cause “for a new trial in light of Kermaree v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 358 U.S.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Bruszewski v. Isthmian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Louis Parker v. Cargill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. James F. Pastore v. Taiyo Gyogyo, K.K. v. Lavino Shipping Co. And City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Nikiforow v. RittenhouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Olsen v. Todd Shipyards Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API