Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1907No. 15,111PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Chautauqua district court; Granville P. Aikman, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*248The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

E. S. Hughes and wife, owners of certain lands, executed a so-called oil-and-gas lease thereof to J. E. Davidson and others, which contained the following provision:

“The lessees agree to commence drilling a well on the land above described, one well in (3) months, 2 additional within one year from the above date. If said lessees fail to complete 3 wells within 12 months as above provided, then and in that case said lessees agree to pay $500 (as a forfeit) to said lessors at the expiration of that time.”

The lessors failed to do anything under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Monmouth Park Ass'n v. Wallis Iron WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  3. Morse v. RathburnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  4. Gibson v. OliverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Sutton v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1863

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Evans v. MoseleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. GabaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. Owen v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. United States v. HoleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1941
  5. Starr v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API