Legal Opinion

State v. Cushing

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1941No. 3343PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, C. J.:

The appellants, Cushing and Rankin, together with Ruth Barnett and Valentine St. John, were charged-in the district court with a felony. The charging part of the information is as follows: “That the said defendants on the 14th day of November, 1940, or thereabouts, and before the filing of this information, at and within the County of Washoe, State of Nevada, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously use and employ a certain instrument, the exact nature of which said instrument is to this affiant as yet unknown, in and about and upon and within…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Workman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People v. MangiapaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wagner v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Collazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Bolden v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Garner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Austin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API