DuPaul v. North Dakota Department of Transportation
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Michael O. DuPaul appeals the district court’s dismissal of his administrative appeal of a Department of Transportation order. The district court found it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because DuPaul failed to properly perfect his appeal under the statutory requirements of N.D.C.C. § 28-32-42. We affirm.
[¶ 2] DuPaul was arrested for driving under the influence on August 3, 2002. DuPaul’s blood-alcohol content was above the legal limit. After the Department of Transportation (“Department”) notified DuPaul it intended to suspend his driving privileges, he requested…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Albrecht v. Metro Area AmbulanceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Trottier v. BirdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Wagner v. North Dakota Board of Barber ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Pederson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fossum v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Deeth v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Stephenson v. HoevenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Opp v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Fossum v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014