Legal Opinion

DuPaul v. North Dakota Department of Transportation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2003No. 20030173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michael O. DuPaul appeals the district court’s dismissal of his administrative appeal of a Department of Transportation order. The district court found it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because DuPaul failed to properly perfect his appeal under the statutory requirements of N.D.C.C. § 28-32-42. We affirm.

[¶ 2] DuPaul was arrested for driving under the influence on August 3, 2002. DuPaul’s blood-alcohol content was above the legal limit. After the Department of Transportation (“Department”) notified DuPaul it intended to suspend his driving privileges, he requested…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. Metro Area AmbulanceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Trottier v. BirdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wagner v. North Dakota Board of Barber ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Pederson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fossum v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Deeth v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Stephenson v. HoevenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Opp v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Fossum v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API