Legal Opinion
Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Bill Inman, David Castro, and John Wilkins, Each Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 2008No. 03-1189Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
════════════
No. 03-1189
════════════
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Petitioner,
v.
Bill Inman, David Castro, and John Wilkins, Each Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
On Petition for Review from the
Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas
════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Argued January 6, 2005
2Opinion of the Court · HechtJustice Hecht, joined by Justice Wainwright, Justice Brister, Justice Medina, and Justice Willett
Chief Justice Jefferson, joined by Justice O’Neill, Justice Green, and Justice Johnson, dissenting.
Three plaintiffs have sued for themselves and a nationwide…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.