Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Buckley

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by the defendant-husband to vacate the plaintiff wife’s notice to examine him before trial. The complaint contains two causes of action — one for separation on the grounds of claimed abandonment and nonsupport, and the other to recover moneys that the plaintiff alleges she was required to expend for necessaries for herself. The stipulations and communications between counsel do not *982so clearly indicate that defendant intentionally waived his right to object to the examination as to warrant invoking the principle of estoppel relied upon by the plaintiff. I shall therefore…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tausik v. TausikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. Field v. FieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  3. Yudell v. YudellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berlin v. BerlinNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Sachs v. SachsNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Bristol-Myers Co. v. Bargain Town U. S. A., No. 2 Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bramer v. BramerNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API