Legal Opinion
Lim v. City of Long Beach
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 2000No. 98-55915PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
The owners of three adult book and video stores and an adult mini-theater (collectively “Plaintiffs”) sued the City of *1053Long Beach (“Long Beach”) challenging the constitutionality of a Long Beach zoning ordinance restricting the locations in which adult businesses can operate. The district court found that the ordinance did not violate the Plaintiffs’ rights under the First Amendment or the Equal Protection Clause. We remand to allow Plaintiffs to develop and present evidence concerning the availability of alternative commercial locations in the Long Beach…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Alfredo Kuba, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. 1-A Agricultural AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- N W Enterprises Inc v. The City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- McGuire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Robert Reynolds v. Douglas MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Tollis, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.