Legal Opinion

Mirto v. NEWS-JOURNAL COMPANY

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 5, 1956No. 397PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

This is a suit by a plaintiff injured as the result of tripping over a piece of wire left on the sidewalk by a newsboy. The Complaint charges that the newsboy uncoiled the wire wrapping around a bundle of newspapers and negligently left the wire lying on the sidewalk, over which plaintiff tripped and fell, injuring himself severely.

Two questions are presented. The first concerns the sufficiency of the allegations of negligence in Par. 4(a) of the Complaint. The second requires a decision as to whether a newsboy is an agent of a newspaper under the doctrine of respondeat superior.

Rul…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Hann v. Times-Dispatch Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Balinski Et Ux. v. Press Pub. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sliter v. CobbMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. LaFleur v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Huntington Publishing Co. v. CarylWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API