Legal Opinion

Matter of Richards

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 25, 1917, which affirmed an order of Special Term rejecting a purported certificate of nomination of appellant as an independent candidate for the office of justice of the Municipal Court in the borough of Brooklyn.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 25, 1917, which affirmed an order of Special Term rejecting a purported certificate of nomination of appellant as an independent candidate for the office of justice of the Municipal Court in the borough of Brooklyn. Edward A. Richards and Harrison C. Glore were the candidates of the Democratic and Republican parties, respectively, for the office of justice of the Municipal Court of the city of New York for the seventh district of Brooklyn. That office was to be voted for by…

1Per curiam

We hold, first, that for the purposes of section 122 of the Election Law a Municipal Court district in the borough of Brooklyn is a political subdivision, and,, second, that said section of the Election Law considered in its general application to the state is not so unfair or unreasonable as to be unconstitutional.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ., concur; Hiscock, Ch. J., not voting.

Order affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haggerty v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  2. Reis v. CoughlinNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Matter of Barfield v. Bd. of Elections, N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Matter of Moore v. . Bd. of Elections of the City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API