Legal Opinion

Wilson v. United Manufacturers Supplies, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 15, 2005No. 1D04-3925Published

1Per curiam

The facts are undisputed in this workers’ compensation case. Those undisputed facts establish as a matter of law that, at the time of the accident, claimant was in the course and scope of his employment. See, e.g., Johns v. State, Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 485 So.2d 857, 858 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (holding that an employee injured on the employer’s premises some 20 to 30 minutes before her normal starting time was within the course and scope of her employment, quoting from 1A Arthur Larson, The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 21.6 (1985)); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Akin, 533 So.2d 829,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lanham v. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. AkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Johns v. State, Dept. of Health and Rehab.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Perez v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API