Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Kyles

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 1980No. 7920SC509PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendants’ first assignment of error raises the question of the propriety of a per diem or fixed formula argument to the jury by the plaintiffs’ attorney as to damages for pain and suffering by Billie Beth Thompson. A per diem argument is an argument to the jury to award damages for pain and suffering at a certain rate per day, hour, or minute of pain and suffering. The plaintiffs’ attorney in the case sub judice made the following argument to the jury:

“If you break this pain from days and you say how many minutes of some type of pain that is for you to decide over that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. McLaney v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Four-County Electric Power Ass'n v. ClardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Certified TV and Appliance Company v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. RAYMOND U v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Crump v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Weeks v. HolsclawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Mickens v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Jones ex rel. Jones v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API