Thompson v. Kyles
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
The defendants’ first assignment of error raises the question of the propriety of a per diem or fixed formula argument to the jury by the plaintiffs’ attorney as to damages for pain and suffering by Billie Beth Thompson. A per diem argument is an argument to the jury to award damages for pain and suffering at a certain rate per day, hour, or minute of pain and suffering. The plaintiffs’ attorney in the case sub judice made the following argument to the jury:
“If you break this pain from days and you say how many minutes of some type of pain that is for you to decide over that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- McLaney v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Four-County Electric Power Ass'n v. ClardyMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
- Certified TV and Appliance Company v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- RAYMOND U v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Crump v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Weeks v. HolsclawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Mickens v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Jones ex rel. Jones v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.