Legal Opinion

In re the Will of Eichenbaum

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 3, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

By order to show canse, the petitioner seeks an order under section 137 of the Surrogate’s Court Act compelling the respondent, an attorney, to produce a will of the decedent. The order was served on the respondent on March 19, 1959. On the return day, an affidavit submitted by an associate alleged that the respondent had left on the S. S. Homeric, and was expected to return during the middle of April. The affidavit admits the possession of the will by respondent, but asserts an attorney’s lien. However, this argument has been effectually disposed of in Matter of Reiss (200…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ReissNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
  2. In re the Estate of FrenchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lucky-Goldstar International (America), Inc. v. International Manufacturing Sales Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API