In re the Will of Eichenbaum
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
John D. Bennett, S.
By order to show canse, the petitioner seeks an order under section 137 of the Surrogate’s Court Act compelling the respondent, an attorney, to produce a will of the decedent. The order was served on the respondent on March 19, 1959. On the return day, an affidavit submitted by an associate alleged that the respondent had left on the S. S. Homeric, and was expected to return during the middle of April. The affidavit admits the possession of the will by respondent, but asserts an attorney’s lien. However, this argument has been effectually disposed of in Matter of Reiss (200…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Estate of ReissNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951
- In re the Estate of FrenchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1952
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lucky-Goldstar International (America), Inc. v. International Manufacturing Sales Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986