Legal Opinion
Wejs v. Heinbockel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 14, 2016No. 2015-03750PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the de fendants John Edward Heinbockel and Kelly Heinbockel appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated February 18, 2015, as denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging common-law negligence insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion of the defendants John Edward Heinbockel and Kelly Heinbockel which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ortega v. PucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mammone v. T.G. Nickel & Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Southern Tier Crane Services, Inc. v. Dakksco Pipeline Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Southern Tier Crane Services, Inc. v. Dakksco Pipeline Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017