Legal Opinion

Pictorial Review Company v. Rosen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 12, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after'stating the facts)." The sole reliance of the plaintiff for a never sal of the judgment is’that the court erred in overruling-its demurrer to the answer of the defendants 'and in permitting the - defendants to introduce evidence to sustain the allegations of their answer.

In making this contention the plaintiff relies upon the general rule that a written contract cannot he contradicted or varied by evidence of an oral agreement between the parties before or at the timé of the execution of isiich contract. This- general rule has been often applied by this court, but exceptions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barton-Parker Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Southwestern Veneer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Main v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. White Sewing Machine Co. v. Atkinson & SonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. William Brooks Medicine Co. v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peter W. Kero, Inc. v. Terminal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. New Home Sewing Machine Co. v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Smith v. Bank of MariannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Wizard, Inc. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API