Pictorial Review Company v. Rosen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after'stating the facts)." The sole reliance of the plaintiff for a never sal of the judgment is’that the court erred in overruling-its demurrer to the answer of the defendants 'and in permitting the - defendants to introduce evidence to sustain the allegations of their answer.
In making this contention the plaintiff relies upon the general rule that a written contract cannot he contradicted or varied by evidence of an oral agreement between the parties before or at the timé of the execution of isiich contract. This- general rule has been often applied by this court, but exceptions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barton-Parker Manufacturing Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Southwestern Veneer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Main v. OliverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- White Sewing Machine Co. v. Atkinson & SonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- William Brooks Medicine Co. v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peter W. Kero, Inc. v. Terminal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. SandersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- New Home Sewing Machine Co. v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Smith v. Bank of MariannaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Wizard, Inc. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932