Legal Opinion

Francisco v. Wright

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1845PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Assumpsit in the Shelby Circuit Court, brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error. The cause was heard before the Hon. Gustavus P. ICoerner and a jury, at the August term 1845, when a verdict and judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

The Opinion of the Court was delivered by

Caton, J.*

This was an action of assumpsit to recover the amount of money paid by the plaintiff to the State Bank, in satisfaction of a decree foreclosing a mortgage executed by Wright and wife to the Bank, to secure a note which the Bank held against Wright. After the execution of the mortgage, Wright sold the land incumbered by the mortgage to Francisco, and conveyed to him by a common warranty deed. The Bank foreclosed the mortgage in chancery, to which proceeding Francisco was not a party. After the decree and before the sale, Francisco paid the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Van Orden v. Van OrdenNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  2. Wells v. PorterNew York Supreme Court · 1831

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldstein v. GreenstoneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API