Karnoski v. Trump
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 RYAN KARNOSKI, et al., CASE NO. C17-1297 MJP 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL REGARDING THE 12 v. GOVERNMENT’S WITHHELD COMMUNICATIONS WITH 13 DONALD J TRUMP, et al., THIRD PARTIES 14 Defendants. 15 16 The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed the LCR 37 Joint Submission 17 Regarding the Government’s Withheld Communications with Third Parties (Dkt. No. 440), the 18 Government’s Surreply to Plaintiffs’ Reply (Dkt. No. 443), along with relevant portions of the 19 record, rules as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jorge Rojas v. FaaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Friends Earth v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019