Legal Opinion
Succession of Cavallino
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1976No. 7861PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Before REDMANN, GULOTTA, and BOUTALL, JJ. GULOTTA, Judge.
This matter is before us on a motion to dismiss. The basis of the motion is that “court costs” were not paid by appellant to the clerk of the trial court. We deny the motion.
On October 20, 1975, the trial judge signed an order granting appellant a sus-pensive appeal, returnable to this court on December 30, 1975. On April 27, 1976, the trial judge signed an order refusing any further extensions. According to the ap-pellee, the record was not lodged in this court on the extended return day because the “court costs”…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Succession of Silas v. MarcianteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lege v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Smith v. Delta Food MartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Succession of CavallinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976