Legal Opinion
Roeben v. United States
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 21, 1953No. Civ. No. 929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
Respondent moves for summary judgment on the libel herein, on the grounds (1) that same is time-barred by the general time limitation provisions of the Suits in Admiralty Act, Title 46 U.S.C.A. Shipping) §§ 741, 745, and (2) because of libellant’s proceedings taken against his employer, Sancor Corporation, a stevedoring company, under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, Title 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., particularly section 933.
The Suits in Admiralty Act.
More specifically, since it is admitted that the libel here was filed October IQ, 1951, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Johnson v. United States Shipping Bd. Emergency Fleet CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Compass Shipping Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Perez v. Costa Armartori, S.P.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Johnson v. Sword Line, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Weck v. District Court of Second Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965