Legal Opinion

Zaitschek v. Walsh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 22, 1986No. 85-1305Published

1Per curiam

The order appealed from — which grants a new trial based solely on an allegedly erroneous jury charge given as to Section 316.160, Florida Statutes (1983), relative to the plaintiff’s alleged comparative negligence in this cause — is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to reinstate the jury verdict and final judgment for the defendants herein. The jury charge was entirely proper based on the evidence adduced at trial, and the trial court erred in concluding otherwise in the new trial order under review. See Catir v. Roberson, 423 So.2d 454 (Fla. 1st DCA…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Ins. Co. v. BallonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Demmy v. SlighDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Catir v. RobersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Naber v. ScottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API