Legal Opinion

Kuhn v. Jackman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1929No. 506PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

We entertain no doubt but that the trust deed is void and of no effect for two reasons, first because the use of the word heirs of the grantor to designate the parties as grantees of the remainder is ineffectual, See, 18 Corpus Juris, 159, and second, because of Section 8617 of the General Code of Ohio, hence we are back to the consideration of this case on the question of the performance under the deed given to the plaintiff.

The evidence makes it clear that while this deed to plaintiff was recorded, there was never any dominion exercised by her over the property; she did not collect nor…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beach v. BuseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  2. Town of Stites v. Wiggins Ferry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Dassel v. HershbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API