Rogers v. Lamb
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the-Madison Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
This was an action.of malicious prosecution', brought, by Lamb against Rogers. The declaration charges that Rogers, maliciously and. without probable cause, procured Lamb to be indicted for forgery; and that', he was afterwards acquitted. Plea, not guilty; Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff below. , ' •
-At the trial, three of the jurors were challenged by Lamb, because they had been on the grand jury--that found the indictment against him; and- the Court sustained the challenge. The cause of challenge, in this case, was good. The jurors objected to, must be considered as having expressed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company v. Knapp and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
3Cited by3 opinions
- Merrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Rhodes v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
- Vansickle v. ShenkIndiana Supreme Court · 1898