Legal Opinion

Briggs v. New York State Thruway Authority

New York Court of Claims

Decided July 6, 1961No. Claim No. 37463Published

1Opinion of the CourtSibhby Squire, J.

The defendant moves for an order permitting the service and filing of a counterclaim. The proposed pleading, unverified, is part of the moving papers. The claimants oppose.

In this court, a defendant is not required to serve an answer to the claim, all allegations of the latter being treated as denied (Rules of Court of Claims, rule 13).

*111A motion such as this, for permission to interpose a counterclaim, is governed, in effect, by the law relating to permission to amend a pleading.

Usually on such motion the court would not examine into and determine the legal sufficiency of a proposed pleading.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API