Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Garkane Power Ass'n

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1982No. 17251Published

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

This is an action to recover damages for the loss of the plaintiffs’ farm crop and planting and soil preparation costs for 1977. The plaintiffs’ claim is premised on the defendant’s alleged contractual obligation to provide the plaintiffs with real “three-phase” electric power by 1977. The district court denied the plaintiffs’ claim, holding that there was no contract, and awarded the defendant $8,883.53 on its counterclaim for power used. Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their action and the counterclaim award.

In 1974, plaintiffs had engineered an irrigation system to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tanner v. BaadsgaardUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Zions First National Bank v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Nuhn v. BroadbentUtah Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API