Legal Opinion

Myers v. Erwin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1914No. Docket No. 100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Assumpsit by Henry E. Myers and Edwin F. Holmes as administrators of the estate of John L. Woods, deceased, against the Muskegon Improvement Company, George L. Erwin and others upon a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, defendant George L. Erwin brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

This action is brought by the administrators of John L. Woods, deceased, upon a promissory note given to him by the Muskegon Improvement Company, having been executed by G. L. Mason, as president, and George L. Erwin, as secretary, and indorsed by George L. Erwin, G. L. Mason, F. L. Holbrook, David D. Erwin, and F. A. Nims..

Defendants interposed a plea of the statute of limitations which was sustained on a former trial in the circuit court, and on review reversed by a decision of this court reported in 169 Mich. 689 (135 N. W. 949), to which reference is made for a statement of the case and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Rogers v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Gates v. FiskMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Myers v. Muskegon Improvement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Barr v. PayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Allen v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Morley v. University of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Myers v. Muskegon Improvement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API