Legal Opinion

Salter v. Beal

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiffs seek to establish a constructive trust in certain machinery alleged to have been purchased by the defendant Beal and to have been conveyed by him to the defendant Mason Machine Works Company. It is alleged that the company took the machinery with notice of the plaintiffs’ rights. The trial judge overruled a demurrer by the defendants and reported the question to this court. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 214, § 30.

The principal issue is whether the allegations of the bill are sufficient to show that the defendant Beal, hereinafter called the defendant, came into such a fiduciary relation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Reed v. A. E. Little Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Cann v. BarryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Bourke v. CallananMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Hurley v. Boston Railroad Holding Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. McCarthy v. RogersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Broomfield v. KosowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Warsofsky v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Ravosa v. ZaisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  4. Berenson v. NirensteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Shelburne Shirt Co. v. SingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API