Curran v. . Lake Champlain M.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff was a brakeman on the defendant's railroad. The road is a short one, extending from Port Henry to Mineville, a distance of about seven miles. Because of the steep grade it is not built in a straight course, but runs up the mountain through a series of "Y's," which mitigate the ascent. The train in question when made up at Port Henry consisted of a passenger car, which was placed in the front, then the tender of the engine, then the engine itself, then a number of gondolas, and finally about twenty ore "jimmies." The latter are small cars, shaped as a hopper, with a running board…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
- Dunne v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Inglese v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Kent v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Lehigh Valley R. v. NormileCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Marus v. Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915