Legal Opinion

Curran v. . Lake Champlain M.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff was a brakeman on the defendant's railroad. The road is a short one, extending from Port Henry to Mineville, a distance of about seven miles. Because of the steep grade it is not built in a straight course, but runs up the mountain through a series of "Y's," which mitigate the ascent. The train in question when made up at Port Henry consisted of a passenger car, which was placed in the front, then the tender of the engine, then the engine itself, then a number of gondolas, and finally about twenty ore "jimmies." The latter are small cars, shaped as a hopper, with a running board…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. MurraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  3. Dunne v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Inglese v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Kent v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Lehigh Valley R. v. NormileCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. Marus v. Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API