Legal Opinion

Wills v. Midland National Life Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1939No. 7,846PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

The plaintiff is the beneficiary in a group insurance policy covering the life of her brother, Hugh Malloy, for $1,000. The policy provided for double indemnity “upon due proof of the death of insured * * * in consequence of bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental means,” within ninety days after injury, as a direct result thereof and independent of all other causes.

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the insured on the 18th day of January, 1937, at about 8 o’clock P. M., had gone from his place of residence to the main section of the city of Butte to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Richards v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Tuttle v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Dalbey v. Equitable L. Assur. Soc. of U.S.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Ashley v. Agricultural Life Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. Finley v. Prudential Life & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lewis v. New York Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Riefflin v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Terry v. National Farmers Union Life Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API