State v. Matasek
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCane, J.
¶ 1. This appeal concerns the proper interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 973.015,1 which grants circuit courts discretion to order that certain criminal convictions be expunged upon successful completion of the offender's sentence. Andrew Matasek argues that §973.015 allows a court to defer making a decision on expunction until after the defendant has successfully completed his or her sentence. The State disagrees, contending that under the statute's plain language, the expunction decision must be made at the time of sentencing. We agree with the State. We therefore reject Matasek's argument that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Commitment of ArendsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- In the Interest of Cesar G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Rotfeld v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Andrew J. MatasekWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. HempCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- State v. HempCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014