Legal Opinion
DeGrella by and Through Parrent v. Elston
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1993No. 92-SC-756-TGPublished
1Opinion of the Court
858 S.W.2d 698 (1993)
Martha Sue DeGRELLA, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Homer PARRENT, III, Appellant,
v.
Joseph G. ELSTON, Appellee.
No. 92-SC-756-TG.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
July 15, 1993.
Homer Parrent, III, Parrent, Vish & Smither, Louisville, for appellant.
Mary Z. Ceridan, Bill V. Seiller, Handmaker & Seiller, ACLU Cooperating Attys., David A. Friedman, Gen. Counsel, American Civ. Liberties Union of Kentucky, Louisville, for appellee.
Vincent F. Heuser, Jr., Louisville, James Bopp, Jr., Thomas J. Marzen, Daniel Avila, John Altomare, Indianapolis, IN, for amicus, Ethics & Advocacy…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Lambert; Concurrence · Lambert; Dissent.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.