State Ex Rel. Szymanski v. Gamble
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶ 1. In this habeas corpus action, Walter G. Szymanski, an inmate of the Wisconsin state prisons, argues that he is entitled to early release on parole because the parole commission has waived the minimum service of sentence requirements pursuant to WlS. Stat. § 304.06(lm)(a) (1999-2000). Like the trial court, we reject Szymanski's argument. We hold that § 304.06, read as a whole, provides that an inmate is entitled to early parole eligibility, not immediate release on parole, when the commission determines to waive the minimum service requirements. We affirm the order denying Szymanski's…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Jefferson v. RenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Coleman v. PercyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Dowe v. Circuit Court for Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Logterman v. DASWSONCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- J v. Ex Rel. Levine v. BarronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Britt v. GambleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Purifoy v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003