Legal Opinion
Windham v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided September 15, 1982No. 115-82PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
ODOM, Judge.
Respondent was convicted for attempted murder and the jury assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at imprisonment for life. On appeal the Court of Appeals for the 11th Supreme Judicial District held that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction for attempted murder. Windham v. State, Tex.App., 627 S.W.2d 505. The petition for review was granted to consider the State’s contention that there was no fatal variance between the allegations in the indictment, to-wit:
“that on or about the 20th day…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Dovalina v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Colman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Eastep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Pesina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
- Ahmadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.