Legal Opinion
Williams v. Colleran
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 10, 1973No. 27605PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Justice.
The defendant concedes that under decisions exemplified by Rakestraw v. Rakestraw, 70 Ga. 806; Cooney v. Walton, 151 Ga. 195 (106 SE 167); Kennedy v. Durham, 220 Ga. 310 (138 SE2d 567); Webb v. Jones, 221 Ga. 754 (146 SE2d 910); Nash v. Crowe, 222 Ga. 173 (149 SE2d 88) and Keown v. Craig, 228 Ga. 194 (184 SE2d 583), had there been contingent remaindermen or had the vested remaindermen agreed, then such a petition for the sale of the parcel of land would not be subject to the motion to dismiss. However, the contention is made that under the Act of 1961 (Ga. L. 1961, pp. 228,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooney v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Webb v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Rakestraw v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Nash v. CroweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Kennedy v. DurhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. BretonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Billings v. BillingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- McGhee v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979