Legal Opinion

Haarmann v. Davis

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 31, 1983No. 64150PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONNELLY, Judge.

This case was transferred by this Court upon application of plaintiffs-appellants after opinion by the Southern District of the Court of Appeals. Rule 83.03. The trial court judgment was in favor of plaintiffs-appellants in the amount of $3,252.79. The Southern District reversed. We now decide this case as if on original appeal. Mo. Const, art. V, § 10.

Plaintiffs Raymond and Norma Haar-mann, husband and wife, entered as buyers into an “Installment Contract for Sale of Real Estate” on July 8, 1973, with Arrowhead Resorts, Inc., a Missouri corporation. The contract provided that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. East Asiatic Co. v. CorashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Peerless Supply Co. v. Industrial Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Senn v. Manchester Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Pelser v. GingoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bongiovi v. SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission v. GreenwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Pelz v. Streator National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Nofziger Communications, Inc. v. Birks Ex Rel. Wynmark TrustDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
  5. Abbadessa v. TindallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API