Legal Opinion

Coquillard v. Suydam

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was a bill in chancery filed by Suydam against Coquillard, Rush, and Henricks.

The bill states that in July, 1838, Henricks and Rush, of South Bend in this state, were indebted to the complainant, resident in New York, in the sum of 3,122 dollars, for goods sold and delivered; that in the same month, the complainant’s agent having come to South Bend to collect the debt, found that Rush was absent in the state of Illinois, but he met with Henricks and the defendant Coquillard; that Coquillard then promised the agent, in consideration that the complainant would forbear and give time to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell v. Clark's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. Ontario Bank v. RootNew York Court of Chancery · 1831

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Dow v. BerryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1883
  3. Taylor v. DoddIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API