Thornton v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Ottis Thornton was convicted for the first degree sodomy of a nine-year-old child and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. Two issues are raised on this appeal from that conviction.
I
The trial court properly prevented defense counsel from cross-examining the victim about statements she made to a clinical psychologist for the Department of Human Resourcesin this particular case. Defense counsel was using a report of a psychological evaluation of the victim prepared by a psychologist for prior juvenile court proceedings in an effort to show that the child "is a habitual liar" and to show…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Van Antwerp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Buice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.