State v. Kiser
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
The first question presented to the court is: Is the affidavit void on the ground that it does not state an offense under the laws of Ohio?
The defendant contends that the affidavit is fatally defective because it fails to state that the letter was sent *128or delivered with an intent to obtain from another person any money, article of personal property, or other thing of value.
Section 2901.39, Revised Code, in pertinent part provides :
“No person shall knowingly send or. deliver a writing for the purpose of extorting money or other valuable thing, or containing willful and malicious threats of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McGrewOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
- Yoby v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2020