Legal Opinion

City of Newark v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 15, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The commissioners of assessments for local improvements of the city of Newark, after hearing had upon notice to the parties in interest, certified to the Essex Circuit Court their assessments for benefits ensuing from the widening of Mulberry street, in the city of Newark; and on December 2d, 1932, Judge Mountain, by formal order, fixed December 9th, 1932, as the time for the hearing of objections thereto, and directed that notice thereof be given to the affected property owners by publication “in at least two of the official papers of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Wight v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Bellingham Bay & British Columbia RailRoad v. New WhatcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. State v. . RickettsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  5. Sewall v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SUMMER COTTAGERS'ASS'N OF CAPE MAY, NEW JERSEY v. Cape MayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API