Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haile v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1989No. A89A1391Published

1DissentBeasley, Judge

I respectfully dissent and would hold that, on the state of the record at this stage, plaintiffs are entitled to a trial.

1. Monroe v. Sigler, 256 Ga. 759 (353 SE2d 23) (1987) is not controlling in the circumstances of this litigation on the claim of malicious prosecution. One of the elements of this cause of action is that the criminal prosecution by defendant was without probable cause. OCGA § 51-7-40; J. C. Penney Co., Inc. v. Miller, 182 Ga. App. 64, 66 (2) (354 SE2d 682) (1987). As quoted in Monroe, supra at 760, plaintiff must show “ ‘that under the facts as they appeared to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Melton v. LaCalamitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Monroe v. SiglerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Pritchard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  4. Newsome v. Cooper-Wiss, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Bowman v. United States Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API