Alpaugh v. Hulse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, William W. Hulse, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Suffolk on the 28th day of August, 1900, upon the report of a referee.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
The purpose of this action was to charge the defendant William W. Hulse, as a partner of the defendant Phillip it. Ketcham, with the purchase price of certain meats sold by the plaintiffs. The defendant Ketcham testified in behalf of the plaintiffs against his co-defendant Hulse to facts sufficient to sustain the finding of the referee that the alleged partnership existed at the "time when the goods were sold, and we cannot interfere with the judgment on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence or on the ground that the decision is against the weight of evidence: A…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Desbecker v. McFarLineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Desbecker v. . McFarlineNew York Court of Appeals · 1901