Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kentucky Southern Coal Corp. v. Kentucky Energy & Environment Cabinet

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2013No. 2010-SC-000029-DGPublished

1DissentScott, J.

I must respectfully dissent as I am perplexed as to how the majority can conflate deep mining with surface mining and then create a “bona fide property dispute” based solely upon an “expired” 18.1 acre surface mining lease necessary only for surface mining as per KRS 381.940, later § 19(2) of the Kentucky Constitution.27 In *812fact, § 19(2) of the Kentucky Constitution specifically provides, in regard to the deep mining permit renewal sought here, “that the mineral estate be dominant to the surface estate for the purposes of coal extraction by ... the method or methods of commercial coal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hazard Coal Corp. v. KnightKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Scott v. LawsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. McIntire v. Marian Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Wiser Oil Company v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  5. Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API